Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Can a true Christian be a secularist?
Pic courtesy: www.longwood.edu
This is the question that has been haunting me for months. I have tried to answer the question myself with utmost integrity, without any tendency of being bias but have not been successful until lately. I slept with the question, I woke up with the question, I went to office with the question, etc etc. I have enquired indirectly to friends and acquaintances their viewpoints without letting them know what I actually intend to. I have prayed enough prayers to God to forgive me if I have intruded on to where I should not as a believer. I was perturbed all the more so with the rise of intolerance among religions and violence in the name of religion the past few months. As a Christian, I was hurt, deeply hurt, by the persecution being perpetrated against Christians in some parts of our country. Why have we become the “unwanted” in our neighbourhood? Is it due to a political propaganda of a particular group to gain political mileage or due to our own fault? Obviously so, it is due to the former if not the latter or both together.
Communal politics have played a significant role in the rise of politicians and political parties. India was partitioned due to the shortsighted vision of a communally inclined leader who had preached chauvinistically about his religion and the need for a separate homeland, a republic based on the teaching of the religion. The consequence of the movement spearheaded by him and the political party he founded was his rise as a tall leader with an impeccable control of the community on the one hand; on the other hand, it had not only caused lost of thousands of precious lives but a scar of hatred among two communities that will no longer vanish in totality years and years to come. The scar of the partition was responsible for all the complications that arose after four decades among the two communities in Ayodhya which otherwise could have been solved amicably through dialogue not the violent way it had been. Ironically, the Ayodhya dispute has catapulted a communal political party as one of the most prominent forces in national politics today.
Christianity as a religion has its foundation laid on the teachings of Jesus Christ. It’s a religion of “love” and to love alone is its ethic based. It is this love which propels us and gives us the zeal to serve and reach out to those who need to be “served”. However, let’s have a closer introspection on “how” we have carried on this. Have we not created unnecessary ripples of suspicion among other religions due to our aggressive “missionary” works? Has not “numbers” become more important than “saved” in the minds of the church leaders which reciprocally implanted “whatever” mindset in the minds of the missionaries to yield a “good harvest”? Is it the purpose of the “call” to allure someone with worldly benefits just to let him embrace Christianity but not accept it? Let us once again be clear that we are not called to “baptise” people with water alone but to let them receive and accept the gospel. It is those people who has been allured not with the gospel but with “benefits” and has been “reconverted” to their previous religion that has spoilt the image of Christianity. It is none other than the deplorable actions of the Christians which has led to the introduction of anti-conversion bills in some states. Let us understand that there has to be a paradigm shift in our approach. We need to broaden our outlook and cultivate a better understanding with other religions by showing respect and concerns to their beliefs and teachings. Let us not chase a soul just to be dumped but earn it through goodwill and work of mercy. Let us not be the examiner to tell them what is “right” just to hurt the sentiments of the community but let them examine us and come to our fold if they find anything convincingly worthy. This will not be against any law as the person is taking his own decision and liberty in exercise of “the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution” and also will pose a greater challenge among Christians, not only the missionaries, in defining Christianity as a way of life not just as a religion.
The founding fathers of our country, India, were enlightened people with deep respect for all religions unlike the leaders of the breakaway fraction which became an Islamic republic. Although Pakistan was created by and for the Muslims, our leaders were not disturbed at all by the fissure that had been created by the Muslim fundamentalists in breaking the country and did not declare India as a Hindu republic although more than 80% of the populations were Hindus. The people of India were given freedom to profess, practice and propagate the religion of their choice. However, the most beautiful word in the constitution appeared only after the 42nd amendment in 1976 with the insertion of “secularism” in the “preamble” of the constitution. In the western concept, secularism is narrowly interpreted as separation between religion and state but in the Indian context, it is broadly interpreted as equality of all religions or Sarva Dharma Sambhav. Secularism acts as the balancing fulcrum between religious intolerance and fundamentalism on one side and state patronisation of a religion on the other. That means that it is the responsibility of all religions to maintain peaceful atmosphere and cordial relationship among themselves to let the state machinery function effectively. This is in consonance with the teaching of the Bible - to love our neighbour as we love ourselves - not giving due importance to self alone. As I have said, Christian ethic is based on love but not on hatred. We cannot be the source of hatred nor be the perpetrator of hatred and misunderstanding.
In the meantime, let’s not be confused with the terms “pluralism” and “secularism”. Pluralism stands for one god taking cognizance of all religions in equal footing with an emphasis on the goal i.e. god whatever religion may be the means. In that case, pluralism is out of the purview of Christianity and is emphatically against the teaching of the Bible. In other words, Christianity and pluralism are poles apart. However, secularism vis-a-vis Indian secularism does not talk about god. It pays emphasis on the peaceful coexistence of all religions with mutual respect and understanding. It underlines the importance of congeniality among men to profess the faith of their belief(s). This doesn’t bar a man from changing his faith at all. He can convert or reconvert to a religion according to his will and conscience without any act of intimidation from any party. It is here that Christianity as a way of life has to play a great role in winning souls without causing dissent among other communities. So, Christianity and secularism can go together hand in hand as much as the head and tail of the same coin. To be a secularist doesn’t necessarily mean not to be a true Christian.
(This article is written from a layman’s point of view. So, it may be futile to argue theologically – Thara Tlau)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
This is a very good article, every Christian should be thinking about this and should have a firm viewpoint or conviction about this matter. As I was asked to read (and indirectly expected to comment, I believe), let me comment on some of my thoughts.
Regarding persecutions and the rise of intolerance of minorities in India, it is my conviction that nothing happens in the physical realm in isolation. The reality of the spiritual realm is undeniable and is as active as, if not more than the physical realm. The recent persecution against the Christians is nothing but a proof in bold letters that the Lordship of Christ and his sayings are genuine. It is also a good sign that Christians, perhaps have finally done something worth noticing. Keep in mind the percentage of Christianity in India and how long that has been! In contrast, one is free to do a research on the rise of Christianity in Orissa, say, even after the death of the Australian missionary Graham Staines. Granted, many Christians and missionaries have made and will continue to make mistakes, but as a true follower of Christ there are things we simply cannot compromise. The Christians in Rome were commanded by the Apostle himself to submit(doesn't mean blind obedience) to the government of Nero! And at what stage in history? At the height of persecution against the Christians!BUT... when it comes to obedience Christians will have to obey the higher law. As Peter said,"...we must obey God rather than men... we cannot but tell what we have seen and heard." There is no compromise here. I would like to add one more thing in this matter; though the Christian's struggle is not against flesh and blood, the VHP, RSS and Bajrang Dal needs to know that they are not up against flesh and blood either. History will prove as it did in the past that it is quite a futile effort to be up against the Omnipotent, Omnipresent and an Omniscient living God.
If you have read carefully my first few lines, you would have already notice as to where I stand regarding Christianity and secularism. There are different levels of defining what is secular and what is not. For example, we say secular music and Gospel music (actually it is not correct to use these term, please read on). No Christians would argue about this, but what many Christians do not deeply think about is the fact that in a larger sense there is no secular for a Christian! It is all sacred! We have the tendency to disect and separate many things that are never meant to be. In the beginning, I have already mentioned that the spiritual unseen realm is as real as the physical realm and these two realms are inseparable, just as our physical body cannot be separated from our spirit and soul. Christians should refrain from having the notion that MTV is secular and of the devil and GodTV is sacred and religious; that Sunday is holy and Monday to Saturday is secular; Missionary work is holy and working in the call centre is not holy, etc. The list can go on. The point is this: The earth is the Lord's and everything in it. He created it all! What God owns is holy, sacred and good. True, evil and evil people has gained some battle grounds in this war, but we know the end result of the war. So, to answer the main question 'Can a true Christian be a secularist?' The answer is no and yes. 'No' that there is no secular, 'Yes' that they should get involve in every sphere of society and not only in the so-called 'Church activities'. There are several spheres of our society or so called 'Mind-molders', to name a few; The spheres of education, government, health care, religion, arts and entertainment, media and communication, etc. All these belongs to God and are therefore sacred. Christians should get involved in politics, law, Bollywood, Hollywood, MTV, newspaper, TV, etc.
Raltefamily, thanks a lot for the "enlightening" comment on the subject. Yes, we Christians tend to be aloof from God's own creation defining from our own wit ends what is "good" and "bad". Let's be acceptable to the world to let them see the "light". I would like to add that Christianity is not sacrosant...
Nice article. Digs deep, this one. For me it is not secularism or pluralism, my concern is that conflict and christianity go hand in hand (see history). I believe, as a christian, that we are convinced that hardship should come to us (we have the right to struggle and suffer too). But the problem is, why do we complain so much about the problems, why cant we accept it. Hebrews 11 (end of the chapter) says something in my defense. Why do we always ask God to save us, nobody said being a christian was a bed-of-roses.
Tha mai em?
Ding, i thil sawi hi thil ni thei tak a niin ka hria, ka lo study chiang ve dawn nia. I Bible chang sawi pawh khi ka lo belchiang ve ang...
Ziak tha hle mai! Thil pawh i cover hnem, thiante nena titi mai mai na a thil i rawn sawi chhuak ve tawp chu a nilo chiang e. Hei chu maungchang deuhva chhiar nawn leh chi a ni e, nakinah ka rawn comment leh ang.
misual.com side-bar ah "Post of the week" ah ka lo dah a, pawi i ti em lovang chu.
Very interesting topic and good writing as usual thara! there are loads to say on this topic... though we know n heard abt some missionaries converting the pple by giving them something in return.... this practice is totally unchristian n its obvious how our Lord isnt pleased abt i..its da soul that matters the most for anyone... what gud is it if one converts without his/her soul being saved.. and without him./her knowing the exact meaning of what Christianity is about! christian lo thenkhat hian krstian te hi blessng nei tam tur riauah te hian min ruat thin a... but i personally dont agree...though we have eternal hope and are so lucky to be saved, our lives isnt at all easy...and prosecution is also a part of it.. we christians are like a people living in a battle field .... lets just make all the hardships, suffering to make us draw closer to Him!
Also another layman's thought: I sometimes wonder if we are really Christians as the Bible intended us to be. I mean, listen to people (Pastors even) talking about salvation and stuff, they seem to be saying "I am scared of ending up in Hell so I'm a Christian." or "My life is so miserable here on earth, going to Paradise would be a HUGE consolation!". Well not exactly the same words, but you know what I mean. Are we Christians just because we are scared of Hell or Satan?? Should we be Christians out of our love for our One and True God? Reasons other than Love are simply not the right reasons to be a Christian.
@illusionaire & puii:
A hmasain illusionaire chungah mi tam zawk hriat leh chhiar theih tura misual.com a ka article tlawm te a lo tar chhuah avangin lawmthu ka sawi ni se. Ani hi Mizo blogger zingah chuan "Pa" chan chang ber leh sap tawnga ziak thin te zinga thiam ber te zinga mi a ni. Puii hi missionary chhungkua a seilian Kathmandu a an chhungkua a Krista Pathian ram tana beitu a ni a. Hetiang lampang ah chuan "a taka hre tu" a ni. He article hian missionary zawng2 hnathawh a huam lova amaherawhchu "buh tak leh lem" chu kan thliar tur ni lovin Pa kutah a awm thung a. Mi tlem te hnathawh "suak" lutukin a taka rawngbawltu te a nek chep hle a ni tih chu kan chian a ngai.
@Carey:
A good reasoning from another layman :-) Yes, if atleast half of those who proclaimed ourselves are true Christians, the world will be a much better place to live in. As I said in the article, Chrisian ethic lies on LOVE. So, let's reason our Christianity through love once again to make a difference altogether.
I have read and re-read your article many times and I still marvel at the flow and presentation of it.
From what I can fathom, this post is not only a topic of debate between the secularist and the non-secularist, but also throws open a wide range of discussion on certain "secular issues" among us Christians too.
As you have mentioned, the word "secularism" has a completely different meaning in the Indian context, mainly due to the fact that India is a very spiritual Country, be it the Vedic past or the Muslim invaders or the British missionaries or the origin of Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism. No other place will you find such a highly congested and assorted "believers" all living at the same place. Even among the CPI and other communist parties, only a few members from the top echelons of the party are true atheists. The rest of them even openly visit temples/mosques. Its only in India that you can find a God fearing communist, or a Christian Maoist!
:)
Taking all that into context, we also have "Indianized" version of Christianity, like the tying of mangalsutras in church weddings and dowry practiced christian marriages, and even the setting up of shrines of Jesus, Mother Mary, other Saints etc exactly like how the idols of Hindu Gods are decorated, complete with bhajans, agarbatis (incense) and laddoo offerings. I'm not saying those are wrong. I'm just trying to point out how we have all influenced each other because of the high level of religion and religious sentiments in this Country. Even PC Sarkar once said "Before the Christianization of India, there must me an Indianization of Christianity". Touche!
From my humble opinion, I feel that one cannot be a true secularist and a religious person at the same time. The moment he tries to follow the path of "Sarva Dharma Sambhav", then he is going against the very ethos and doctrine of his own religion. We can treat people who follow different religions as equals, but we cannot treat different religions as equals.
Even among us Christians, we have the never ending debate between secular and non-secular issues, ranging from choice of music to lifestyle, because after all, we are entering the domain of spiritualism versus materialism in a way. I completely agree with what Raltefamily has written regarding this issue. It is wrong for us to call anything we think is not related to Christianity as evil (MTv, Hollywood, rock bands etc) unless we are a recluse living far away from civilization and modernization on a lonely hill-top all by ourselves.
For me, I truly feel that the most effective way of spreading the Name and Word of our Lord here in India is to lead a Christian Life the way God wants us to. God's message will then reflect automatically from us and we do not need any aggressive missionary work or spreading propaganda about other religions that can hurt their sentiments to bring others into our fold. That is not how God wants us to spread His name. We are only tarnishing His name that way.
I find your post very interesting, and I understand the emotional turmoil you go through as a Christian and the injustice done to the minorities in Orissa. I am outraged myself as a human being though I do not profess to any faith, except trying to be a good human being.
BUT, I am rather confused why your anger is focused towards the Muslims who have nothing to do with the outrageous act against the Christians in Orissa and your perception of secularism and pluralism.
In your 2nd paragraph, You have stated about the separation of India and Pakistan and the ambition of a particular leader without stating any in depth analysis or historical in sight of what happened in the History of India, especially after 1911, or at all when the term/ nation Pakistan was coined.
I am neither a fan of Nehru or Jinnah, but I think that your opinion is based on some reading that is not backed by historical facts or an understanding of communal politics in that era.
I will not touch on the subject of Christianity and missionary zeal, but I have never understood how Christianity applied to the Mizo people as I have never felt loved except within my Mizo family and friends. I only learnt about the ‘true love of Christianity’ once I stepped out of Mizoram. But this is my own faith and no one should question me nor do I question you.
The founding fathers of our country included people of all religions, and perhaps at that time, leaders from Christian religion were a minority. The Minorities Committee was headed by Harendra Coomar Mookerkee, who represented all Christians other than the Anglo Indians.
Very intersting discussion, not in mere academic, but also in practical terms.
I do vote for secularism as you have defined it here. It has been said that the term secularism means different things in different places. In the West, for example, it is tied up with atheism. But the secularism we have in India just means equal rights of all religions. And so one can (and should) be secular even while being a true Christian. After all, true Christianity is about living as Christ leads, not just a religion.
Regarding the Orissa violence against Christians, we have to protest it as it is cruelty and injustice. We should have protested when the same was done to Muslims in Gujarat. We do not give back violence for violence, but we have to speak up for those who are unfairly victimised.
@illusionaire:
Indianisation of Christianity is rather a boon than a bane. Had the first Christian missionaries understood the importance of accepting and appreciating the indigenous cultures the outlook of today’s Indian Christianity would be much better. It was due to the mistakes of the pioneer missionaries that Christianity was viewed as westernization by many. The importance of indigenous form of worship was understood intrinsically among the Mizos only after the first “Harhna” where khuangte and khuangpui played major roles.
@shahnaz kimi:
I appreciate your viewpoints on the topic. However, I’m confused by your statement “BUT, I am rather confused why your anger is focused towards the Muslims”. Nowhere in the article did I mention a condemnation about Muslim or Islam. I did mention that the rift between the two religions can be mainly attributed to a religiously biased leader who was instrumental in instilling a divisive mindset to the masses. I, categorically, mention about the rise of a Hindu fundamental political party as a mover and shaker of modern Indian politics. Moreover, my condemnation was all the more so to some missionaries for the “aggressive” nature of their work. Once again, thanks a lot for the constructive criticism.
@mesjay:
Yes, we have to protest violence against any community whether it’s against the Christians, the Muslims, the Hindus etc. Any act of violence targeting against a particular community is an act against humanity itself.
A very insightful post.
On persecutions of Orissa Christians and Christians in general I just want to put the word of Christ here:
"Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. - Matthew 5:11-12 [NIV]/Biblegateway.com
Sadly, though everything belongs to God, we are yet to dwell in Heaven where persecutions will cease to exist. Persecutions tell us that we are still on this Earth. God allows such things to happen, I'm saying this with a heavy heart. But this proves all the more how true we are as believers. We must never pay back evil for evil. We must continue to love who persecuted us. The first martyr Stephen prayed like Jesus to the ones who stoned him. I hope we can pray harder for our fellow believers.
On the question of Secularism: You have rightly mentioned Secularism may take different forms in different countries, and it is true. First of all, I believe all Christians are secularists but not all secularists are Christians. This will best define where the so-called secularists cross the limits and boundaries of the way of life followed by Christians. Therefore, it will depend much on how Secularism is defined and practiced. To me, secularists are way better than any religious fanatics who have no respect for others.
So, to the question, "Can a true Christian be a secularist?" I will say, an emphatic YES. WE must live a life conforming to the way of Christ. A good reference will be Ecclesiastes 12:1-12 - Enjoy your life and remember God. There is limit to everything, that's where Christians and secularists may part ways. We can't separate ourselves from this world, we have to live in it and we must live displaying the beautiful ways of the Lord.
@Shanaz said : I will not touch on the subject of Christianity and missionary zeal, but I have never understood how Christianity applied to the Mizo people as I have never felt loved except within my Mizo family and friends. I only learnt about the ‘true love of Christianity’ once I stepped out of Mizoram. But this is my own faith and no one should question me nor do I question you.
Hi Shanaz, I just want to let you know that I read this and it gives me a lot of introspection.
@The BT Rock:
Your comment gave me another viewpoint which i fully subscribe to - "I believe all Christians are secularists but not all secularists are Christians". Being a secularist Christian doesn't necessarily mean accepting other religion(s) or their teachings. It may mean accepting "dialogues" between religions to arrive at a more cordial relationship amongst religions so as to create a better world - a world of understanding where a Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, etc can co-exist peacefully. Regarding persecution, the Bible verse you've quoted is the source of strength for all Christians and also it means that we should never be against those who persecute us but rather a "good Samaritan" as always.
Hi Thara,
I think i will have to go through the article several times to post my version. Anyway,I believe that there has to be a series approach towards the points raised by the author.As Christians, we have to make sure that we apply Bible in our life.Then we should preach for others.Moreover,rather than conversion of religion,we should concentrate on giving Christ to all.Automatically,everything will follow. I will reply to this article later on, in a broader version.
...........regards, Prajith.
@Prajith:
You are most undoubtedly right in saying "...rather than conversion of religion,we should concentrate on giving Christ to all." Moreover, to repeat your words once again "as Christians, we have to make sure that we apply Bible in our life" so that people will see the difference.
Post a Comment